What To Know:
- Bitwise registered a Delaware statutory trust named “Bitwise Uniswap ETF,” an early structural step that does not confirm an SEC filing or signal active regulatory review.
- The move follows the SEC’s closure of its Uniswap Labs investigation.
- Analysts say any future ETF approval would hinge on unresolved issues such as on-chain liquidity fragmentation, custody risks tied to smart contracts, and governance mechanisms like Uniswap’s Fee Switch.
Bitwise has taken an early procedural step that could eventually lead to the launch of a Uniswap-linked ETF, according to public records filed this week in the state of Delaware.
The asset manager registered a Delaware statutory trust under the name “Bitwise Uniswap ETF,” a move that establishes the legal structure required before any potential federal submission to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The filing does not confirm that an ETF application will follow, nor does it signal that regulators are currently reviewing such a product.
Bitwise Moves Toward Uniswap-Linked ETF
State-level trust registrations are commonly used by ETF issuers to secure naming rights and prepare operational groundwork well before engaging with federal regulators. In many cases, these entities remain dormant and never advance to the SEC filing stage.
Market participants described the registration as a preparatory measure rather than a commitment. Vincent Liu, chief investment officer at Kronos Research, said the step functions mainly as a placeholder. It allows Bitwise to remain flexible while monitoring regulatory conditions and market demand. According to Liu, the move reflects positioning rather than momentum toward a defined launch timeline.
The development arrives against a shifting regulatory backdrop for decentralized finance in the United States. In February 2025, the SEC formally closed its investigation into Uniswap Labs, ending a probe that had examined whether activity linked to the protocol breached federal securities laws.
That investigation was part of a broader enforcement campaign that sought to determine whether platforms described as decentralized were still governed by identifiable entities subject to regulatory oversight. The closure of the case removed a major source of legal uncertainty surrounding the Uniswap ecosystem.
Since President Donald Trump began his second term, the SEC has withdrawn from at least 17 enforcement actions previously brought against crypto firms. The agency’s posture has changed noticeably, with less emphasis on litigation and greater attention placed on market structure and compliance standards.
Analysts say that shift matters for firms exploring crypto-based ETFs. Analysts belive that Bitwise’s registration demonstrates an effort to align regulatory clarity with product readiness. The closure of the Uniswap investigation clears one hurdle, but approval would depend on how regulators assess decentralization, liquidity depth, and execution risks.
Notably, the filing itself may have limited immediate impact on the market. Instead, it underscores the technical questions that remain unresolved. Among them is how value flows within decentralized protocols, particularly as governance decisions increasingly affect investor exposure.
One issue drawing renewed attention is Uniswap’s Fee Switch mechanism. The governance feature redirects a portion of trading fees from liquidity providers to the protocol. Proposed in November and approved by token holders the following month, the mechanism is seen by analysts as a potential driver of long-term value accrual for UNI holders.
With institutional products under consideration, consistent revenue models have gained importance. Analysts argue that clearer fee structures could become more relevant if Uniswap-related exposure is ever packaged inside regulated investment vehicles.
Liquidity remains another central factor. Liu noted that Uniswap shows strong on-chain liquidity overall, though trading volumes are fragmented across pools and networks. Decentralized governance also complicates oversight, particularly when compared with centralized exchanges that operate under unified management structures.
If Bitwise chooses to advance toward a federal filing, custody would represent one of the most complex hurdles. Unlike spot Bitcoin ETFs that rely on established custodians, exposure to decentralized protocols depends on smart contracts. That structure introduces additional layers of technical and operational risk.
These risks would be closely examined by regulators. Areas of focus would likely include market integrity, susceptibility to manipulation, pricing reliability, and the depth of liquidity available directly on protocol. The SEC would also evaluate how much trading activity occurs on markets subject to surveillance agreements.
Also Read: Hang Seng Gold ETF Prepares Tokenized Fund Units on Ethereum
