What To Know:
-
Australia’s Bitcoin Industry Body has filed a formal complaint alleging inaccuracies and selective framing in an ABC News report.
-
The group argues the article dismissed recognised real-world Bitcoin use cases while overstating criminal-activity associations and stablecoin dominance.
-
The dispute follows similar debates on media accountability, highlighted recently by David Sacks’ challenge to reporting practices at The New York Times.
Australia’s Bitcoin lobby has lodged a complaint against the national broadcaster stating that a recent report in the ABC News broadcast had factually inaccurate representations, selective context and framing that depicts Bitcoin as a tool for criminal activity rather than a technology with recognised economic functions. The Australian Bitcoin Industry Body (ABIB) submitted this report on Tuesday, marking one of the most direct assaults to crypto reporting standards reported to a major Australian media service this year.
Australia’s Bitcoin Organizations Calls Out ABC News
The complaint comes after an ABC analysis piece about Bitcoin’s price volatility and doubts over the long term if it has potential utility as a monetary network. Ian Verrender, chief business correspondent, wrote the article, explaining that Bitcoin had “never realised any of its stated goals and has no useful purpose.” It added that the asset was better suited to “those operating in the shadows,” suggesting that its original role was overtaken by stablecoins, including Tether’s USDT.
ABIB says those statements overlook publicly documented applications that extend beyond speculation or illicit finance. These include Bitcoin-powered grid-balancing systems, humanitarian remittance channels for high-inflation regions, small-business payments infrastructure and broader adoption by corporates and sovereign entities. The organisation argues that ABC News did not provide this context, despite it being sourced easily from public research, energy sector trials, and commercial adoption disclosures.
According to ABIB, the coverage breached the broadcaster’s Editorial Policies and Code of Conduct, which require accuracy, fair representation of evidence and balanced sourcing. The group said it receives regular messages from the public expressing frustration over what they view as recurring mischaracterisation of Bitcoin in legacy media. “The public deserve better,” ABIB wrote in its statement, while requesting corrections.
The organizations also urged the broadcaster to consult subject-matter experts when reporting on digital assets. The dispute has surfaced during a period of significant market volatility. Bitcoin recently rebounded to roughly $92,972 following weeks of decline, a bounce that once again pushed crypto markets into headline territory. Price instability typically amplifies media scrutiny, and industry participants argue that this makes factual precision particularly important.
The ABC report also scrutinised Tether, citing investigations that linked USDT flows to wallets associated with illicit activity. These references include international coverage about the Cambodia-based Huione Group, which US authorities earlier flagged for laundering billions tied to North Korean cyber operations, human trafficking and large-scale online fraud. In October, regulators in the US and UK placed restrictions on the group, resulting in partial shutdowns of Huione payment operations. ABIB does not dispute the relevance of such investigations, but points out that extrapolating such cases to describe the full ecosystem may mislead public understanding of how stablecoins operate within regulated contexts.
Media accountability in crypto reporting is emerging as a broader concept, and Australia’s experience reflects recent disputes in global newsrooms on several fronts. In the US, White House official David Sacks recently challenged The New York Times over a story that suggested potential conflicts of interest during his tenure as a Special Government Employee.
Sacks released correspondence with reporters and a legal letter accusing the report of relying on anecdotes, unverified claims and incomplete context. Many charges fell apart after evidence was presented, prompting a conversation about accuracy, sourcing and responsibility in high-stakes reporting, his office said.
From there, the Sacks episode has spread broadly across policy networks, with commentators likening disputes over political coverage to those at the forefront of digital-asset reporting. In both cases, opponents say, incomplete information can harden public opinion quickly, and corrections, if issued, are too late to reverse perception. The ABC has not yet made a formal statement to ABIB’s complaint.
Also Read: Spain Proposes New Law Increasing Taxes on Bitcoin & Other Crypto
